The good old “God of
the gaps” argument. I’ve been accused of this and arguing from ignorance
numerous times. The assumption is that because science does not know how the
universe was formed, then theists assume there is a deity to make up for our
ignorance. After all, science has closed many gaps in the past, so there is no
reason to believe that science will not also find answers for the other areas
we do not understand yet.
Science does indeed close
many gaps in areas that we do not understand, but what about the gaps that
science opens? What about the gaps that keep getting wider the more science
learns? What about gaps that are so large that to close them through natural
causes requires basic scientific, philosophical, and metaphysical principles to
be violated? What about the gaps that give an appearance of design? That is
more than a mere gap. It’s an abyss; an abyss that natural causes are unable to
cross. I’m not saying “I don’t know; therefore, God”. I’m saying “Natural
causes can’t; therefore, God”.
So here is my “God of
the naturally insurmountable abyss” argument:
1) Everything which begins to exist has
a cause.
2) The universe began to exist.
3) Therefore; the universe had a cause.
4) The universe is made of energy,
space, and time.
5) Energy, space, and time cannot cause
itself to come into being.
6) Therefore; the cause of the universe
must be immaterial, spaceless, and timeless.
7) An infinite regress of causes is
impossible.
8) Therefore; an uncaused cause must be
the cause of our universe.
9) Only abstract objects or an
unembodied mind can be immaterial, spaceless, timeless, and uncaused.
10) Abstract objects cannot cause
anything.
11) Therefore; the cause of the
universe is an unembodied mind.
No comments:
Post a Comment