Francis Collins
was a physician and the project manager for the Human Genome Project, which was
a project to map the DNA of humans. A
single strand of DNA consists of 3 billion base pairs. If you were to read it at an average pace, 7-days per week, 24-hours
per day it would take 31 years! Mapping
this is no small task. He wrote a book
called, The Language of God: A Scientist Presents Evidence for Belief. As always, why read a book if there is a
video to watch instead!?!
The first
half of the video is his testimony on how he came to realize the truth of
Christianity and second half is how he reconciles faith and evolution. Here’s a summary:
Francis
Collins was not raised in a religious home and was an atheist when he started
med-school. He had a patient who was
dying and he wondered how she was so at peace at the end of her life. She was a Christian and asked him what he
believed. He realized that he didn’t
really know and had never investigated any evidence to form an opinion one way
or the other.
“Scientists are supposed to make
decisions after they look at the data, after they look at the evidence. I had made a decision that there was no God
and I’d never really thought about looking at the evidence. That didn’t seem like a good thing. It was a decision that I wanted the answer to
be, but I had to admit I didn’t really know whether I had chosen the answer on
the basis of reason or whether because it was a convenient form of perhaps
willful blindness to the evidence. I
wasn’t sure there was any evidence, but I figured I had better go find out.”
·
There
is something instead of nothing
·
The
unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics
·
The
Big Bang
·
The
precise tuning of physical constants in the universe
·
The
Moral Law
He came to
believe in a creator, but did not know which god to choose from. It seemed to him that this type of evidence
required monotheism. He investigated
Islam, Judaism, and Christianity. After reading CS Lewis, he settled on
Christianity since it provided the redemption he felt he needed. He also was relieved that there was good
evidence for his faith in Christ and that it did not require him to take a
blind leap.
“I discovered this great sense of
peace and a joyfulness about having finally crossed that bridge, and also to
have done so in a fashion that seemed to live up to my hopes that faith would
not be something you had to plunge into blindly, but something were there was
in fact reason behind the decision.”
One of the things I found interesting about Collins is that
he is what is known as a “theistic evolutionist”; he believes God created
through the undirected process of evolution as described by Darwin. He rejects the Intelligent Design movement,
where many claim that evolution needed God’s direction to create the complex
changes we see, as using the “God of the gaps” argument.
“ID turns out to be,
and I’m sorry to say this for those who have found this a very appealing
perspective, but I think it is the truth that ID turns out to be putting God
into a gap in scientific knowledge which is now getting rapidly filled. And that God of the Gaps approach has not
served faith well in the past and I don’t think it serves it well in this
instance either.”
“ID is not only turning
out to be science that’s hard to defend, it’s also sort of an unusual kind of
theology cause it implies that God wasn’t quite getting it right at the
beginning and had to keep stepping in and helping the process along because it
wasn’t capable of generating the kind of complex structures that were needed
for life. Wouldn’t it actually be a more
awesome God who started the process off right at the beginning and didn’t have
to step in that way?”
Collins thinks the term theistic evolution is confusing, so
he prefers BioLogos which means, Life through The Word. He founded the BioLogos website to help show
that faith and science, specifically evolution, can be reconciled. He makes the following statement in the
video:
“Almighty God, who is not limited in
space or time created our universe 13.7 billion years ago with its parameters
precisely tuned to allow the development of complexity over long periods of
time. God’s plan included the mechanism
of evolution to create the marvelous diversity of living things on our
planet. Most especially, that creative
plan included human beings. After
evolution, in the fullness of time, had prepared a sufficiently advanced
neurological “house” (the brain), God gifted humanity with free will and with a
soul. Thus humans received a special
status, “made in God’s image”. We humans
used our free will to disobey God, leading to our realization of being in
violation of the Moral Law. Thus we were
estranged from God. For Christians,
Jesus is the solution to that estrangement.”
This obviously does not match a literal interpretation of
Genesis nor a literal Adam and Eve. One
of the responses Collins gives is to say that Genesis 1 & 2 seem to
disagree in the order of creation for humans and plants, so why do we think
those chapters were meant to be taken literally or as science? Collins also says that requiring a literal
interpretation of Genes is a recent phenomenon and quotes Augustine from 1600
years ago:
“In matters that are so obscure and
far beyond our vision, we find in Holy Scripture passages which can be
interpreted in very different ways without prejudice to the faith we have
received. In such cases, we should not
rush in headlong and so firmly take our stand on one side that, if further
progress in the search for truth justly undermines this position, we too fall with
it.”
~Saint Augustine, 400 AD, The
Literal Meaning of Genesis
Evolution is something that I’m starting to look at. I’ve never investigated the evidence for or
against it nor thought through all of the implications. I hope to write about my findings as I go
along.
It is strange to me that those who are convinced by what they consider evidence for by what seems to me a vague definition of God, they almost always settle on one of the specific religions rather than becoming a deist. The line that stood out to me was "the redemption he felt he needed." This emotional cue is probably his catalyst for conversion and is rationalizing evidential reasons to fulfill his more intellectual needs.
ReplyDeleteCollins says in the video that his investigation was a two-year process of looking at the evidence. It sounds like he did become a deist first, but continued looking to see if the creator had revealed himself to his creation. My guess is his conversion process has more details in his book. There may have been an emotional piece to his conversion, but I don’t believe this is exclusive to theistic conversions. Deconversions also occur for very emotional, non-rational reasons. One cannot label a theistic conversion as irrational simply because the whole person, which includes the emotional part of the individual, came to believe in Christ.
DeleteWell said.
Delete