I asked my
7-year-old “What comes from nothing?” and was, well, not surprised by her
answer. “Nothing comes from nothing,
Duh!” Oh the hours of laughter our
family has had over the word “Duh”, but that is something and I am writing
about nothing….or am I? Of course, my
daughter is very smart, but she is only 7 and has no grounds to argue with a
PhD theoretical physicist and cosmologist that says something can come from
nothing.
It is a
well-established metaphysical truth (and basic intuition that even a child can
understand) that out of nothing, nothing comes.
So, I was a little surprised when many atheists online began to tell me
that Lawrence Krauss has demonstrated that something can come from nothing and
pointed me to the video below called “A Universe From Nothing”. Krauss has since written a book titled the
same. Here is what Richard Dawkins wrote
about the book.
Those are
some strong words! He must really be on
to something if this book/video is really as devastating as the Oxford
professor claims it is. Here's the video for
those who want to sit through an hour long science lesson with a lot of theistic
derision.
I was very curious how he got around the 1st Law of Thermodynamics,
which states that energy cannot be created nor destroyed, but can only change
forms. It was pretty clear how. Here are some of my favorite quotes from the
video:
“nothing isn’t nothing”
“nothing weighs something”
“let’s calculate the energy of
nothing”
“nothing is really a boiling,
bubbling brew of virtual particles that are popping in and out of existence”
Nothing
isn’t nothing? Nothing weighs something??? Krauss says in the video that theists are
experts at nothing, so since I am a theist, I can say with the authority of an
expert that Krauss knows nothing about nothing!
So what is
this “nothing” Krauss believes produced our universe? In empty space there is still energy present
called the vacuum energy. It cannot be
seen and has not been directly detected, which is why it is also called dark energy. Its value is known as the Cosmological
Constant, which Einstein mistake nly put on the wrong side of the equation can
called it his biggest blunder (even Einstein’s mistakes were brilliant). How do we know dark energy exists if it
cannot be directly detected? Matter is
attracted to other matter due to gravity.
If all we had in the universe was the matter we see, the universe would
collapse in on itself due to the gravitational attraction. We know the universe is expanding and energy
is required to push matter apart; therefore, there is energy pushing the
universe apart. In 2003, WMAP measured the Cosmic
Microwave Background radiation and determined that only 5% of the universe is
made up of the matter we see (stars, galaxies, planets, etc), 24% is made up of
dark matter, and 71% is made up of dark energy.
Essentially
Krauss is saying that 71% of the universe is nothing….except it weighs
something, has energy, is full of virtual particles popping in and out of
existence, contains quantum fields, and is pushing the universe apart. Plus the laws of physics had to exist prior
to the universe forming. I’m curious as
to why Krauss feels the need to change the definition of the word "nothing" if physics
truly shows that God is unnecessary.
David
Albert, who is a professor of philosophy at Columbia University, wrote a
scathing review here. You know it’s bad when a fellow atheist says
this:
“Krauss is dead wrong and his religious and philosophical critics are absolutely right.”
Krauss’s
response was to call him a “moronic philosopher”.
This is what
happens when smart people are determined to deny that God exists and try to use
science to falsify the creator of science.
They profess to be wise and become fools (Romans 1:22).
No comments:
Post a Comment